Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Raj Kumar @ Raju vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34035 of 2019 Applicant :- Raj Kumar @ Raju Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Devesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A. for the State.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 63 of 2019, under Sections 328m 342m 323, 506, 376, 379 IPC, Police Station Chandauli, District Chandauli with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
I have perused the FIR as well as the order by means of which the bail application has been rejected by the court below.
Perusal of the record shows that the applicant has been named in the FIR and he has been assigned a specific role.
I have also perused the statement of the girl recorded under Section 164 CrPC. I have also perused the medical report which supports the case of the prosecution.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A., perusing the averments as contained in the present bail application and looking to the seriousness of the allegation as made in the FIR, gravity of offence and the severity of punishment, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Accordingly, the application for bail is rejected at this stage.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 Kuldeep
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raj Kumar @ Raju vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Devesh Kumar