Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Raj Kumar @ Lalla Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 24
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15718 of 2018 Applicant :- Raj Kumar @ Lalla Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Misra,Anita Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Recovery is false, planted and is not supported by any independent witness. Mandatory provisions provided in the N.D.P.S. Act were not followed at the time of search and seizure. Both recovered contraband are below the commercial quantity. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 16.03.2018.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the quantity of recovered contraband, nature of the offence, provisions for release of accused on bail, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Raj Kumar @ Lalla Yadav involved in Case Crime No. 58 of 2018, under Section 8/20/21 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Baksha, District Jaunpur be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicants will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 Sanjeet
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raj Kumar @ Lalla Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 April, 2018
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Dinesh Kumar Misra Anita Singh