Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30531 of 2018 Applicant :- Raj Kumar Bind Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Ashraf Ali,Madan Lal Srivastava,P.K. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Counter affidavit filed by learned AGA is taken record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Submission is that the victim and the applicant & co- accuseds are all closely related and they are residing in the same house. The applicant is elder uncle of the victim. It has been submitted that it is case of false implication. There is a dispute regarding property between them. The medical report does not supports the prosecution case. The applicant is in jail since 23.04.2018.
On the other hand learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Raj Kumar Bind, involved in Case Crime No.61 of 2018, under Sections 376D, 504, 506 IPC and Section 5G/6 Protection of Children from Sexual Offence (POCSO) Act, Police Station Mirzamurad, District- Varanasi be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.
Order Date :- 31.5.2019 SS