Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Mr Rahul Y vs State Of Karnataka Health And Family And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|31 July, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31st DAY OF JULY 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL WRIT PETITION NO.34443/2017(EDN-MED-ADM) BETWEEN:
MR.RAHUL Y, S/O YELLAREDDY M AGED: 18 YEARS KACHANAYAKAHALLI (V) HENNAGARA(P),ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU – 560 105. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. KARNATAKA EXAMINATIONS AUTHORITY SAMPIGE ROAD, 18TH CROSS MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU – 560 012 REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.
3. ADMISSION OVERSEEING COMMITTEE II FLOOR, K.E.A.BUILDING,SAMPIGE ROAD 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU – 560 012 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI N K RAMESH, STANDING COUNSEL FOR R2; GA SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.2 TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO APPEAR IN THE ONLINE COUNSELLING PROCESS TO SELECT MBBS/BDS SEATS BY PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO SELECT THE SEAT UNDER THE RESERVED CATEGORY IIIA.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
1. Sri N.K.Ramesh, learned Standing Counsel is directed to take notice for respondent No.2.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of by directing respondent No.2-Karnataka Examinations Authority to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.07.2017, a copy of which is produced as Annexure-F.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent no.2 fairly submits that the aforesaid representation of the petitioner will be considered within four days from today. His submission is placed on record. In view of this submission, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no further order is necessary in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Petition disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE brn
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mr Rahul Y vs State Of Karnataka Health And Family And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
31 July, 2017
Judges
  • K S Mudagal
  • H G Ramesh