Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Rahul Sharma vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|13 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13746 of 2020 Petitioner :- Rahul Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinit Mishra,Meena Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ved Byas Mishra
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
None has appeared for the petitioner even in the revised call.
Heard learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Ved Byas Mishra who appears for the fourth respondent.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent states that subject to verification of all facts and contentions on merits being kept open, the claim of the petitioner for approval being accorded to appointment shall be duly evaluated in light of the communication of the D.I.O.S. dated 22 May 2017 and a final decision communicated with expedition and preferably within a period of four months from the date of presentation of a duly authenticated copy of this order. He further states that the second respondent shall proceed in the matter with due notice to respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6.
Accordingly, this petition shall stand disposed of in light of the statement noted above.
Order Date :- 13.1.2021 faraz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rahul Sharma vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
13 January, 2021
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Vinit Mishra Meena Mishra