Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Rahul Rana vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 2 ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 November, 2014

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Mohd. Tahir,J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. in case crime no. 895 of 2014, under section 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., P.S. Kavi Nagar, District Ghaziabad.
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed supplementary affidavit annexing therein a photocopy of the draft prepared in the name of respondent no. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the present case the amount of Rs. 1,20,000/- has been paid to the respondent no. 3 through bank draft.
From the perusal of the impugned F.I.R. it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein a prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interference in the F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused.
However, considering the nature of the allegations made in the F.I.R., the provisions of section 157 Cr.P.C. and the view taken by the Apex Court in the case of Joginder Kumar Versus State of U.P. 1994 Cr.L.J., 1981, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in above mentioned case, till the credible evidence is not collected by the I.O. during investigation.
With the above direction this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 17.11.2014 v.k.updh.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rahul Rana vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 2 ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 November, 2014
Judges
  • Ravindra Singh
  • Mohd Tahir