Court No. - 4
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23421 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rahul Jain And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyam Narayan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Bala Krishna Narayana,J. Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Sri Manoj Kumar Tripathi, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 3 today, taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Manoj Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no. 3.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR dated 27.7.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 717 of 2018, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Hapur Nagar, District Hapur.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the impugned FIR has been lodged by the respondent no. 3, wife of petitioner no. 1 containing absolutely false and concocted allegations against her husband, mother-in-law, brothers-in-law sisters-in-law regarding commission of offences by them under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 506 IPC and section 3/4 D.P. Act. He next submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned FIR no credible evidence whatsoever is coming forth even prima facie indicating at the petitioners complicity in the commission of the alleged crime and for the aforesaid reason the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed.
Per contra learned A.G.A. submitted that from the perusal of the impugned FIR and on the basis of the allegation made therein, it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is disclosed against the petitioners.
After having heard learned counsel for the parties present and perused the impugned FIR, we are not inclined to quash the same.
However, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we direct that investigation of the aforesaid case shall go on but the petitioner nos. 2 to 7 shall not be arrested till the submission of police report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. subject to their extending full co-operation during investigation. So far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, it is directed that in case the petitioner no. 1 appears before the court concerned within thirty days from today and applies for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously, if possible, on the same day by the courts below in view of the settled law laid by the Seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 Cr. L. J. 755 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
With the aforesaid direction, this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.8.2018 RPD