Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Rahman vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8756 of 2019 Applicant :- Rahman Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Birendra Singh Khokher Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
S/Sri Kandarp Srivastava and Kaustubh Srivastava, Advocates filed their Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, S/Sri Kandarp Srivastava and Kaustubh Srivastava, learned counsel for the complainant, Sri R.K. Singh (B.H.), learned counsel appearing for the State and perused the record.
According to prosecution case, F.I.R. was lodged against ten accused persons, namely, Mojam, Imamuddin, Abdulla, Rahman, Abdul, Sabir, Bhure, Jabir, Yunus and Ajam alleging that on 10.5.2018 they assaulted Dilshad. He received one head injury caused by Abdul Salam and died.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 28.9.2018 (more than five months) having no criminal history. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The role of knife was assigned to the applicant but no incised wound was found on the body of the deceased. There is cross case also, which was registered as Case Crime No. 188 of 2018, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 325 and 504 I.P.C. There is no eye witness account against the applicant. There is no independent witness against the applicant and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the complainant opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant and admitted that applicant has no criminal history.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let the applicant Rahman involved in Case Crime No. 184 of 2018, under Section 147, 148, 323, 324, 307, 302, 352, 452, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Saroorpur, District-Meerut be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 28.2.2019 OP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rahman vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2019
Judges
  • Aniruddha Singh
Advocates
  • Birendra Singh Khokher