Challenging the dismissal order dated 26.07.2016 passed in M.P.No.3778 of 2016 in C.C.No.-- of 2016 by learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, present revision has been filed.
2.Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent.
3.Learned counsel for petitioner submits that complainant was unable to be present before Court below due to observance of advocates' boycott during the relevant period.
4.Considering the said submission, this Court is inclined to set aside the order under challenge. Accordingly, Criminal Revision case stands allowed. The order of learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet passed in M.P.No.3778 of 2016 in C.C.No.---- of 2016 dated 26.07.2016, shall stand set aside. The complaint dated 15.03.2016 filed by petitioner in C.C.No.---- of 2016 is restored on file. Learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet is directed to proceed further in accordance with law.
18.01.2017 Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no cla To
1.The XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
C.T. SELVAM, J cla Crl.R.C.No.1190 of 2016 18.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in