Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Manav Chaurasiya, brief holder for the State and perused the material placed on record.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that in the present dispute, applicant is only landlord of the house in question and nothing has to do with the business, which was conducted at there. It is further submitted that this fact is very well accepted in the FIR as well as in the order of bail rejection. It is also submitted that other accused Nadim and Batiya, who were involved in the said business, have been granted bail by the Court below vide order dated 28.10.2020 in Bail Application No. 3385 of 2020. Applicant is aged about 70 years and having no criminal history. He is languishing in jail since 20.12.2020 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Manav Chaurasiya, brief holder for the State has opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant Rahish @ Raisuddin, involved in Case Crime No. 206 of 2020, under Sections- 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC & Section 63/65 of Copy Right Act, 1957 (14) and 78, 79 Trade Mark Act, 1999 (47), Police Station- Chhatta, District- Agra be released on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court/Authority/Jail Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
This bail order would be subject to the fulfilment of following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
4. The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;
5. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
6. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
7. In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 29.1.2021 Junaid