Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Raghunath Sahai Chaudhary And Ors vs State Of U P & Ors

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 22867 of 2013 Petitioner :- Raghunath Sahai Chaudhary And 2 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 4 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Prakash Srivasta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
1. Petitioners, admittedly, were appointed on honorarium basis as Demonstrators in Government College Lucknow and were regularized on same post. Their claim for designation as “Assistant Lecturer”, has been rejected vide impugned order dated 03.06.2012 passed by Director, Technical Education, U.P. and this order has been impugned in present writ petition.
2. Counsel for petitioner has also stated that petitioner 1 has died and there is no substitution, therefore, writ petition is abated qua petitioner 1 and is surviving only for petitioners 2 and 3.
3. It is not in dispute that post of “Assistant Lecturer” and “Arts Demonstrator” are different posts with different duties and responsibilities. This fact has been noticed by Director, Technical Education, in impugned order which reads as under:-
b aftfu;fj ax b aLVªDVj ¼lgk;d izoDrk½ %& lacaf/kr 'kk[kk esa 65 izfr'kr izkIrkad lfgr fMIyksek rFkk lacaf/kr VsªM eas vuqHko@vizsfUVlf'kiA dk;Z ,oa mRrjnkf;Ro%& Nk=ksa dks lS)kfUrd ,oa izk;ksfxd fo"k;ksa dk v/;kiu dk;ZA b aLVªDVj Mªkb ax ¼dyk vuqn s'kd½%& MªkQ~VeSu eas vkbZ0Vh0vkbZ0 lfVZfQdV rFkk Mªkbax vkfQl eas 02 o"kZ dk vuqHkoA dk;Z ,oa mRrjnkf;Ro%& Nk=kas dks izk;sfxd fo"k;ksa dk v/;kiu dk;ZA “Engineering Instructor (Assistant Lecturer):- 65% marks in concerned branch alongwith diploma and experience/apprenticeship in the concerned trade.
Duties and responsibilities:-
Teaching works to the students of theory and practical subjects.
Instructor Drawing (Art Instructor):- I.T.I certificate in Draftman and two years experience in drawing office. Duties and responsibilities:- To teach students on practical subjects.”
4. When questioned learned counsel for petitioner could not dispute that petitioners were appointed as “Demonstrator”. We, therefore, do not find any substance in the claim of petitioners that they should be given designation of Assistant Lecturers. The same has been rightly rejected by Director, Technical Education, U.P.
5. Writ petition lacks merit. Dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 Vikram
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raghunath Sahai Chaudhary And Ors vs State Of U P & Ors

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ravindra Prakash Srivasta