Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Raghu B vs Somashekar And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|08 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.55682 OF 2017 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
RAGHU B.
S/O. BHADRACHALA B.K. AGED 42 YEARS R/AT NO.6, BELUR NIVAS BINNY LAYOUT, 9-H MAIN NEAR PIPELINE ROAD VIJAYANAGARA BANGALORE-40. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. T.A. KARUMBAIAH, ADV.) AND:
1. SOMASHEKAR S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED 68 YEARS.
2. MASTER RITHWIC R. S/O. RAGHU B. AGED 6 YEARS MINOR REPRESENTED BY SOMASHEKAR, PETITIONER NO.1 BOTH ARE R/AT NO.31 RAJENDRAPRASAD ROAD 1ST E MAIN, GIRINAGARA BANGALORE-85. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. VISWANATH SHETTY, ADV. FOR C/R-1 AND R2) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-D THE ORDER DATED 28.11.2017 PASSED BY THE V ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT BANGALORE ON I.A.NO.2 AND G & WC 257/2017 AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Mr. T.A.Karumbaiah, learned Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr.V.Viswanath Shetty, learned Counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition on the ground that the same has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE akc/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Raghu B vs Somashekar And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
08 April, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe