Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mr Rafath Zama vs Mrs Mumtaz Khanum

High Court Of Karnataka|10 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR R.P.F.C. NO.73 OF 2015 BETWEEN:
MR.RAFATH ZAMA, S/O HIDAYATHULLA ALIAS, JAFFERUZ ZAMA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, CHAMUNDI BADAVANE, 10TH CROSS, GANDHI NAGAR, TIPTUR – 572201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.B.S.NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:
MRS.MUMTAZ KHANUM, W/O RAFATH ZAMA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, NO.90/1, NEHRUPURAM, THIMMAIAH ROAD, BHARATHI NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 001. ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI.AYAZ AHMED, ADVOCATE) **** THIS R.P.F.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.02.2015 IN C.MISC.NO.461/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDL. PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, 2 PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C.
THIS R.P.F.C. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. In the present case, as per order dated 26.08.2015, interim stay was granted subject to petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.50,000/- within three weeks from the date of the order and shall continue to pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- per month from 26.08.2015. But, there is no compliance of the said order. There are no valid grounds to admit the petition.
Hence, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE SJ
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mr Rafath Zama vs Mrs Mumtaz Khanum

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
10 April, 2019
Judges
  • Ashok G Nijagannavar