Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Radhey Shyam vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35383 of 2003 Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
"(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents no. 3 to decide the appeal of the petitioner dt. 25.8.2001 pending before him till this date.
(ii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no. 3 to pass a suitable order on representation of the petitioner dated 26.09.2002 still pending before him.
(iii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents to ignore adverse entry if any relating to combing dt. 19.11.97 and to score it out.
(iv) An order, or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents to make the payment of salary to the petitioner w.e.f. 19.11.97 as if no adverse entry has been made against the petitioner.
(v) an order, writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents no. 2 to 4 to grant bonus to the petitioner from 19.1.2002.
(vi) an order, writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents to grant selection grade to the petitioner from 16.10.2001.”
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 24.8.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Radhey Shyam vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Sanjay Kr Srivastava