Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20629 of 2002 Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru' Principal Secy. Small Industries & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned recovery letter dated 18.2.2002 of the respondent no. 2.
(b) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no 2 to issue the sanction order of remaining 10 % G.P.F. Amount of Rs. 10538-00 of the petitioner along with uptodate interest as full and final payment as admissible under rules.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 PS