Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Radheshyam vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8170 of 2021 Petitioner :- Radheshyam Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Awadh Narain Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Sanjay Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Petitioner has been offered compassionate appointment on fixed pay vide order dated 22.1.2004, passed by the District Basic Education Officer, Etah. Contention is that compassionate appointment ordinarily would be in the nature of substantive appointment and petitioner cannot be treated and placed in fixed pay. Reliance is placed upon a judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.12190 of 2005, Smt. Puspa Devi vs. State of U.P. and others, decided on 10.08.2011.
Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submits that such claim of the petitioner would be examined by the District Basic Education Officer, Etah.
In light of the above, it would be appropriate to direct the respondent no.3 to examine petitioner's claim and to pass necessary orders, keeping in view the law laid down by this Court in the case of Smt. Pushpa Devi (supra) and in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of presentation of a copy of this order.
Writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 Puspendra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Radheshyam vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 August, 2021
Judges
  • Pankaj Bhatia
Advocates
  • Awadh Narain Rai