Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Radhammal vs Murugesan And Others

Madras High Court|23 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
jv When the Second Appeal came up for hearing on 19.01.2017, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter to be posted today, under the caption “For dismissal”.
2. Even today, though the matter is listed under the caption “For dismissal”, when the matter was called, no one has represented the appellant.
3. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
23.01.2017
jv To
1 The Sub Judge, Vellore
2 The Additional District Munsiff, Vellore.
S.A.No.341 of 1999 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Radhammal vs Murugesan And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
23 January, 2017
Judges
  • G Jayachandran

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.