Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Radhamma vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala|05 June, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner contends that she is sought to be dispossessed pursuant to the impugned order of the Taluk Land Board. I find that the petitioner is not a party to the order of the Taluk Land Board. The remedy therefore of the petitioner is to apply under Section 85(8) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act. The petitioner has to seek for setting aside the order of the Taluk Land Board in so far as it relates to her land. 2. Any such application filed by the petitioner within one month from today shall be dealt with by the Taluk Land Board as per law. Final orders thereon shall be passed within a period of four months. The claim of the petitioner shall be considered along with the claim raised by other claimants. The petitioner shall not be dispossessed in the meanwhile.
The Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No costs.
V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Radhamma vs State Of Kerala

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
05 June, 2014
Judges
  • V Chitambaresh
Advocates
  • Sri
  • Pillai