Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Radhamma And Others vs H M Manjunath And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|27 July, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3786/2016 (MV) BETWEEN :
1. SMT. RADHAMMA W/O LATE A.P.DAYALAM AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 2. D.GEETHA D/O LATE A.P.DAYALAM AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT COOLIE, BLOCK SHED BHADRAVATHI – 577 301 ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI D.PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE) AND :
1. H.M.MANJUNATH S/O H.M.VEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/O VALLABHAPURA, H.B.HALLI BELLARY DISTRICT – 583 101 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR NEKRC GULBARGA BELLARY DIVISION BELLARY – 583 101 ...RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 26.06.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.47/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ADDITIONAL MACT, SHIMOGA, SITTING AT BHADRAVATHI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):
On 30.05.2017, two weeks’ time was granted for compliance of office objections raised on the appeal failing which it was ordered that the appeal would stand dismissed. As the office objections were not complied within the time granted, the appeal stood dismissed on expiry of the time granted. Hence, no further order is necessary.
Appeal dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE KSR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Radhamma And Others vs H M Manjunath And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2017
Judges
  • K S Mudagal Miscellaneous
  • H G Ramesh