The petitioner has approached this Court because of the alleged callous inaction on the part of the second respondent in implementing Ext.P2 order passed by the 1st respondent, for causing the electric line to be drawn through the route as mentioned therein, so as to provide power supply to the premises of the petitioner. Though the petitioner approached the concerned respondent several times referring to Ext.P2 order dated 4.8.2014, the same is still to be given effect to and hence the writ petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent and the learned Government Pleader for the 1st respondent.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the second respondent is extending undue favours to the third respondent who is placing all hurdles in drawing the line, in spite of Ext.P2 order, which has become final as the same has not been subjected to challenge.
W.P.C. No. 26740 of 2014 -2-
4. Despite the completion of service of notice on admission to the 3rd respondent, she has not chosen to appear before this Court. As such, it has to be reasonably presumed that, she has no objection in granting the relief to the petitioner. The learned Standing Counsel for the K.S.E.B submits that, the line has been drawn through the route specified in Ext.P2, also availing police protection and that, power supply will be given to the petitioner implementing Ext.P2 at the earliest, at any rate within ten days, subject to satisfaction of all the amounts legally due to be paid by the petitioner for having such connection.
The submission is recorded and the matter is disposed of accordingly. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the concerned respondent for further steps.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
kp/-