Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19616 of 2019 Petitioner :- Smt. Radha Tripathi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Tripathi,Satyendra Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satish Chaturvedi Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Sri Prabhakar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Satish Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.
The petitioner have challenged the impugned notice dated 11.02.2019 issued under the provisions of Section 13 (2) and notice dated 22.04.2019 issued under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Against the said notices the petitioners have an statutory alternative remedy of filing an appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the aforesaid Act.
It is open to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedy as provided under the Act. We are not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage.
The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed on the ground of statutory alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 31.5.2019 Lbm/-