Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Radha Kishan vs Inspector General

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7382 of 2002 Petitioner :- Radha Kishan Respondent :- Inspector General (Registration) U.P. Allahabad & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogish Kumar Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“(a) issue a writ of certiorari order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 10.10.2001 passed by the respondent no.1.
(b) issue a writ of mandamus order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to pay salary to the petitioner w.e.f. 1.2.91 alongwith 13% interest.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.7.2018 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Radha Kishan vs Inspector General

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Yogish Kumar Saxena