Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Rachna And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 4
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 31245 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rachna And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Yadav,Ray Sahab Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Bala Krishna Narayana,J. Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the impugned FIR dated 30.9.2018 in Case Crime No. 267 of 2018, under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C., P.S.- Islam Nagar, District- Budaun..
From the perusal of the FIR, it appears that on the basis of allegation made therein, the prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no scope of interfering in the FIR. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the FIR is refused.
However, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the kidnapped girl shall be produced before the court concerned, it is directed that in case the alleged kidnapped girl Smt. Rachna appears or is produced before the court of learned C.J.M., Budaun, within 20 days from today and moves an application for her medical examination, recording her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C, the learned Magistrate concerned shall fix a date for the same purpose. On that date, the first informant & Officer-in-charge of the police station concerned shall be summoned. She shall be produced before C.M.O. concerned by the concerned police officer for her medical examination. Thereafter, she shall be produced before C.J.M concerned for recording her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. The same shall be recorded on the application filed by the I.O./Officer-in-charge of the police station concerned. Till then, no coercive step shall be taken against the petitioners and in default of it, it shall be open to the police authority concerned to arrest the petitioners, if she is found major and does not support the F.I.R. version, the petitioners shall not be arrested till submission of the police report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. but the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation. In case the alleged kidnapped girl appears to be minor or if she is major but supports the prosecution version, it shall be open to the police authority to arrest the petitioners. In case the petitioners approach the S.S.P. concerned to provide the security for the above mentioned purpose, the same shall be provided to them.
It is further directed that issue of custody of the alleged kidnapped girl shall also be decided by the C.J.M. concerned in accordance with law.
With the above direction this petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 31.10.2018 Shalini
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Rachna And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 October, 2018
Judges
  • Bala Krishna Narayana
Advocates
  • Surendra Kumar Yadav Ray Sahab Yadav