Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R Surendran /Appellant vs Muthulakshmi

Madras High Court|14 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It is seen that, the appeal is pending from the year 1991, and no purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending, when no steps have been taken to get the appeal numbered. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, CMA.Sr. is rejected.
14.02.2017 arr http://www.judis.nic.in DR.S.VIMALA,J.
Arr C.M.P. No.12946 of 1990 in CMA.Sr.No.42074 of 1991 http://www.judis.nic.in 14.02.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R Surendran /Appellant vs Muthulakshmi

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 February, 2017
Judges
  • S Vimala

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.