Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R Saravanaprabhu vs The Inspector Of Police And Others

Madras High Court|18 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.01.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.2084 of 2011 R.Saravanaprabhu ...Petitioner Versus
1. The Inspector of Police, R-9, Valasaravakkam Police Station, Valasaravakkam, Chennai 600 087.
2. The Executive Officer, Valasaravakkam Municipality, Valasaravakkam, Chennai 600 086.
3. D.Mahalakshmi
4. D.Vijayalakshmi
5. J.C.Beaula (Power Agent of 3rd and 4th respondent) .. Respondents Prayers: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents, his men, agents herein from interfering or disturbing the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the properties in item No.1. Vacant site measuring 29'.9” feet North-South and 27 feet East-West, admeasuring an extent of 803 ¼ sq.ft. in S.No.136/6B bounded on the North by plot No.B, South by Dharmalingam's vacant site, East by 10 feet Common passage west by Gengammal's site Item No.2. Vacant site measuring 29'.9” feet North South and 27 feet East-West, admeasuring an extent of 803 ¼ sq.ft. in S.No.136/6C bounded on the North by plot No.C, South by Plot No.A, East by 10 feet Common passage, West by Gengammal's site Item No.3. Vacant site measuring 29'.9” feet North South and 27 feet East West, admeasuring an extent of 803 ¼ Sq.ft. in S.No.136/6D bounded on the North by Thiruvalluvar Salai, South by Plot No.B, East by 10 feet Common passage, West by Gengammal's site all the items 1, 2 and 3 are in Thiruvallur Salai, Kaikankuppam Village, within the limits of Valasaravakkam Third Grade Municipality except by due process of law.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.A. Vimal Mohan For RR1 : Mr.S.Diwakar, Spl.G.P.
For RR2 : Mr.P.S.Jayakumar For RR3 to 5 : Writ Petition is Dismissed vide order, dt. 24.02.2012
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed.
18.01.2017 pvs To
1. The Commissioner of Corporation, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai.
2. The Assistant Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Zone IX, No.1, Lake Area, 4th Cross Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai 34.
D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J.,
pvs W.P.No.2084 of 2011 18.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R Saravanaprabhu vs The Inspector Of Police And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
18 January, 2017
Judges
  • D Krishnakumar