Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R Santhanam vs State Represented By Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court|22 March, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing on 21.03.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, it was directed to be listed today under the caption ''for dismissal''. Even today also there is no representation for the petitioner, hence this Court presumes that the petitioner has not evinced any interest to prosecute the petition.
T.MATHIVANAN, J., ssn 2. Keeping in view of the above fact, there is no other go for this Court excepting to dismiss this petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
22.03.2017 ssn To
1. The Special Judge (Special Court) Prevention of Corruption Act, Salem.
2. Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Salem.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
CRL.O.P.No.5436 of 2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R Santhanam vs State Represented By Inspector Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 March, 2017
Judges
  • T Mathivanan