Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R Rasu [ vs The District Collector Revenue Divisional Officer O/O The Revenue Divisional Office Kallakurichi Revenue Tahsildhar Revenue Tahsildhar Office Chinnasalem Tk Villupuram District Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District ,The Revenue Divisional Officer O/O The Revenue Divisional Office Kallakurichi Revenue Tahsildhar Revenue Tahsildhar Office Chinnasalem Tk Villupuram District Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District ,The Revenue Tahsildhar Revenue Tahsildhar Office Chinnasalem Tk Villupuram District Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District ,The Revenue Tahsildhar Office Chinnasalem Tk Villupuram District Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District ,The Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District

Madras High Court|22 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.S.Navaneethan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider his representation dated 04.09.2017 and dispose of the same on merits in accordance with law.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner has given a representation as early as on 04.09.2017, the respondents 3 and 4 have not passed any order so far.
4. Mr.S.N.Navaneethan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the respondents 3 and 4 may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.09.2017, and pass orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties.
on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondents 3 and 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.09.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice to all the interested parties.
With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
22.09.2017 rg To
1 The District Collector Villupuram Villupuram District.
2 The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o.The Revenue Divisional Office Kallakurichi Villupuram District.
3 The Revenue Tahsildhar O/o.The Revenue Tahsildhar Office Chinnasalem Tk. Villupuram District.
4 The Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District.
M. DURAISWAMY,J.
rg
W.P.No.25656 of 2017
22.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R Rasu [ vs The District Collector Revenue Divisional Officer O/O The Revenue Divisional Office Kallakurichi Revenue Tahsildhar Revenue Tahsildhar Office Chinnasalem Tk Villupuram District Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District ,The Revenue Divisional Officer O/O The Revenue Divisional Office Kallakurichi Revenue Tahsildhar Revenue Tahsildhar Office Chinnasalem Tk Villupuram District Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District ,The Revenue Tahsildhar Revenue Tahsildhar Office Chinnasalem Tk Villupuram District Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District ,The Revenue Tahsildhar Office Chinnasalem Tk Villupuram District Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District ,The Taluk Surveyor Tahsildar Office Chinnasalem Villupuram District

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Duraiswamy

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.