IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION No.8538/2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S R & R SALONS PVT. LTD., A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.55, 5TH MAIN, KODIHALLI, BEHIND LEELA PALACE, HAL II STAGE, BANGALORE-560 008.
REP. BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT-FINANCE, MRS. SHRUTHI B.N., ... PETITIONER (BY SRI S.R.TEJAS, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. VIMALA PINTO, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. M/S HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED (HDFC LTD) NO.51, HDFC HOUSE, KASTURBA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001.
REP. BY ITS HEAD, CREDIT RISH MANAGEMENT AND AUTHORISED OFFICER, MR. VISHWANATH B.HOOLI.
2. DR.VINAY NARAYANA PANDIT S/O NARAYANA PANDIT, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 3. MRS. RUKMINI DEVI V., D/O LATE VENKATARAMACHAR PANDIT, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 4. DR. V. PADMARAJAMMA D/O LATE VENKATARAMACHAR PANDIT, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.1379, 24TH CROSS, 24TH MAIN, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560 050.
…RESP0NDENTS ( BY SRI B.S.MAHENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O R2 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 02.01.2019 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE TRIAL COURT IN CRL.MISC.APPLICATION NO.3283/2018 ON THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 14 OF THE ACT VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT THE R-1 TO RESTORE THE PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE B PROPERTY AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri S.R.Tejas, learned Advocate on behalf of Smt. Vimala Pinto, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.S.Mahendra, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
The learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous as the same has been amicably settled between the parties out side the Court.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of this writ petition, in case, the matter is not amicably settled.
With the aforesaid liberty, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE PB