Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R Prakash Chand vs The State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court|23 March, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This Criminal Original petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 29.11.2016 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB Cases and CBCID Metro Cases, Chennai in Crl.MP.No.949 of 2016 and to direct the respondent to register a First Information Report based on the petitioner's complaint dated 12.01.2012, investigate the same and file a final report. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that as against one N.Govindaraj, he has lodged a complaint with the respondent police, alleging that the said Govindaraj demanded money for obtaining patta for the land at Vilaagkattupakkam, Ambattur Taluk and received a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- on 19.12.2006 and agreed to register the property in the name of the petitioner and also received further sum. It is further alleged in the said complaint that the total sale consideration of the property is Rs.62,10,000/-. The said N.Govindaraj also promised to return the advance amount of Rs.25,00,000/- along with interest and cancel the agreement, in the event of the patta being not obtained, however, he did not take any efforts to obtain patta. Further, he has not returned the money as promised, till date. Since no action was taken on the said complaint, the petitioner filed a petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C before the Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB Cases (relating to cheating cases in Chennai) and CBCID Metro Cases, Chennai, seeking a direction to the Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, Chennai to register the petition, investigate the same and file a final report. The said petition was taken on file as Crl.MP.No.949 of 2016, which was, by order dated 29.11.2016, rejected, as not maintainable. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner is before this Court with the present petition.
3. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that instead of approaching the Jurisdictional Court concerned, the petitioner has filed the petition before some other Court i.e., Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai.
4. In view of the submission so made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the petitioner is permitted to file the complaint afresh before the Jurisdictional Court so as to proceed further on merits and in accordance with law.
5. The criminal original petition is disposed of accordingly.
23.03.2017 rk To
1. The Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB Cases and CBCID Metro Cases, Chennai.
2. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
rk Crl.O.P.No.5441 of 2017 DATED: 23.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R Prakash Chand vs The State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
23 March, 2017
Judges
  • R Mahadevan