Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

R Lokesha vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|29 May, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P NO. 5791/2015 BETWEEN R. LOKESHA, S/O LATE C. D. RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.439, 4TH CROSS, SARAKKI EXTENSION, J. P. NAGAR 1ST PHASE, J. P. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE – 560 078.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAYASIMHA K. P., ADV. [ABSENT]) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS THE POLICE INSPECTOR, SAMPIGEHALLI POLICE STATION, SAMPIGEHALLI, BANGALORE 560 064 2. SATYA SIDDA, S/O SIDDA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO.1, 4TH CROSS, NARAYANANAGARA II STAGE NEAR TIPPASANDARA, THALAGHATTTAPURA POST, BANGALORE CITY, KARNATAKA 560 109. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SANDESH J. CHOUTA, SPP-II FOR R-1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME No.141/2015 FOR OFFENCES P/U/S 447, 427, 506 R/W SEC 34 OF I.P.C., FILED THE SAMPIGEHALLI POLICE, SAMPIGEHALLI, BENGALURU AGAINST TO THE PETITIONER AND IT IS PENDING BEFORE THE C.M.M. AT BENGALURU.
THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The case called thrice since morning. The petitioner and his counsel remained absent and no representation. Therefore, it appears the petitioner and his counsel has no interest in prosecuting the case. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE PL*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

R Lokesha vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2017
Judges
  • K N Phaneendra