Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Puttananjamma And Others vs Smt Lakshmamma And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|26 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 462 of 2018 (DEC) Between:
1. SMT. PUTTANANJAMMA WIFE OF LATE SUBBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS ALL R/AT NO.408/389 I CROSS, KURUBA STREET CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN.
2. SRI MAHADEVAIAH S @ MAHADEVEGOWDA SON OF LATE SUBBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A NO.408/389 1 CROSS, KURUBA STREET CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN.
3. SRI LINGEGOWDA SON OF LATE SUBBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/A NO.408/389 I CROSS, KURUBA STREET CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN.
4. SRI NANJUDNASWAMY SON OF LATE SUBBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS ALL ARE R/A NO.408/389 I CROSS, KURUBA STREET CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN.
5. SMT SARASAMMA DAUGHTER OF LATE SUBBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS ALL ARE R/A NO.408/389 1 CROSS, KURUBA STREET CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ASWATHANARAYANA. L., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) And:
1. SMT LAKSHMAMMA WIFE OF LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS I CROSS, KURUBA STREET CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN.
2. SRI RAJESH @ DORESWAMY SON OF LATE NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS I CROSS, KURUBA STREET CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.11.2017 PASSED IN R.A. NO. 18/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHAMARAJANAGARA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.02.2013 PASSED IN O.S. NO. 198/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHAMARAJANAGAR.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellants. This Court on 23.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge KPS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Puttananjamma And Others vs Smt Lakshmamma And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
26 November, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad