Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Puttamma D/O Thayappa @ And Others vs Sri Shamanna And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|28 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.816 OF 2017 Between:
Smt Puttamma D/o Thayappa @ Dodda Thayappa (Since dead) by her legal Representatives 1. Smt Shanthamma W/o Shankarappa Aged about 38 years 2. Sri Srinivas S/o Kollappa Aged about 36 years 3. Sri Muniraj S/o Late Kollappa Aged about 34 years 4. Sri Ananth S/o Late Kollappa Aged about 32 years All are R/at Parappana Agrahara Begur Hobli Bangalore South Taluk ... Appellants (By Sri Manivannan G., Advocate – absent) And 1. Sri Shamanna S/o Thayappa @ Dodda Thayappa Aged about 52 years R/at Kempanayakanahalli Jigani Hobli Anekal Taluk 2. Smt Venkatamma W/o Yadlappa Aged about 70 years R/at Lakshmipura Village Jigani Hobli Anekal Taluk 3. Sri Sampangi Ramappa S/o Yadlappa Aged about 47 years R/at Lakshmipura village Jigani Hobli Anekal Taluk 4. Sri M. Nagaraju S/o K.Muniswamy Raju Aged about 53 years R/at No.1825, 18th Main 4th Block, Jayanagara Bengaluru 5. Sri Manohar S/o Late Patel V.Muniyappa Aged about 47 years R/at No.27/1 3rd Cross, 8th Main Byrasandra, Jayanagara Bengaluru-560 011 ... Respondents This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 23.09.2016 passed in RA No.18/2008 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, sit at Anekal, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.02.2008 passed in OS No.118/2004 on the file of the Prl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and J.M.F.C., Anekal.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day, the Court delivered the following:-
J U D G M E N T None appears for the appellants.
2. This Court on 01.02.2019, granted two weeks time to comply with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would stand dismissed if the office objections are not complied with. The office objections have not been complied with despite this order.
3. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE RB
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Puttamma D/O Thayappa @ And Others vs Sri Shamanna And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
28 August, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad