Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Puspanjali @ Prinsi vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52046 of 2019 Applicant :- Puspanjali @ Prinsi Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Amar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
Shri IKshwaku Srivastava, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama in the Court today on behalf of first informant which is taken on record.
This anticipatory bail application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. has been moved seeking the bail of applicant namely Puspanjali @ Prinsi, in the event of his arrest in Case Crime No.0135 of 2019, under section 307 I.P.C., Police Station- Sarpataha, District- Jaunpur.
Heard Shri Anmol Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Shri Amar Nath Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Counsel for the applicant has not been able to point out any such aspect which may persuade this Court to lean favourably towards the accused. The allegations appear to be very serious. The matter deserves deeper probe and this Court does not propose to put a spanner in investigation in any manner which must be allowed to have its full operative ambit independently without being trammeled or restricted in any manner in a matter like this. The accused would be needed for interrogation to ascertain the correct facts and the nature of accusations are such that the same appears to be a necessary part of the investigation. In a matter like this granting bail is likely to hamper the investigation to take its full swing.
After considering the submissions advanced on behalf of rival sides, the nature and gravity of the accusation and the material in support of the same, I find no good ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of the bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 shiv
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Puspanjali @ Prinsi vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 November, 2019
Judges
  • Karuna Nand Bajpayee
Advocates
  • Amar Nath Tiwari