Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Pushpendra @ Pappy Lodhi vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 August, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard Sri Vijay Shantam, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record..
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 73 of 2021, under Sections- 363 and 366 IPC, Police Station- Varla, District- Aligarh, during pendency of trial.
It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. As per the FIR, applicant enticed away the victim namely Archana from the house of her aunt (Bua) namely- Mamta. It is further contended that the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which, she specifically stated that she left her house on her own and went to her Village Pokharpur where she met the applicant, then the police has arrested them. It is further stated in the statement that nothing wrong has been done by the applicant. The charge-sheet has already been submitted on 14.6.2021 and the investigation had already been completed. The applicant is in jail since 22.5.2021 and has no criminal history and if he is released on bail, there is no chance of his absconding or misusing the liberty of bail or tampering with the prosecution witnesses.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail. The application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Pushpendra @ Pappy Lodhi who is involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 27.8.2021 Akbar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pushpendra @ Pappy Lodhi vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 August, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Joshi