Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Pushpaveni vs The District Collector Coimbatore District

Madras High Court|15 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.24767 of 2017 Pushpaveni ...Petitioner v.
1 The District Collector Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.
2 The Executive Engineer Public Works Department PAP Project Makkinampatti Post, Pollachi Coimbatore District.
3 Sub Divisional Officer Public Works Department PAP Project, Subdivision Office Aliyar, Pollachi Taluk Coimbatore District.
4 The Zonal Deputy Tahsildhar Pollachi, Coimbatore District.
5 The Revenue Inspector Kottur, Pollachi Taluk Coimbatore District
6 Arukkani ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to consider the representation dated 08.09.2017 sent by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within the time fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Veeraraghavan For Respondents : Mr.R.Rajeswaran Special Govt. Pleader - for R1 to R5 O R D E R Mr.R.Rajeswaran , learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents 1 to 5. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider her dated 08.09.2017 and pass appropriate orders, within a time frame.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner's representation dated 08.09.2017, the 1st respondent has not passed any order so far.
4. Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 submitted that the 1st respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.09.2017 and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to the 6th respondent, within a period of eight weeks.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.09.2017 and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to the 6th respondent, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
costs.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No 15.09.2017 Index: Yes/No Rj To
1 The District Collector Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.
2 The Executive Engineer Public Works Department PAP Project Makkinampatti Post, Pollachi Coimbatore District.
3 Sub Divisional Officer Public Works Department PAP Project, Subdivision Office Aliyar, Pollachi Taluk Coimbatore District.
4 The Zonal Deputy Tahsildhar Pollachi, Coimbatore District.
5 The Revenue Inspector Kottur, Pollachi Taluk Coimbatore District M.DURAISWAMY,J.
Rj W.P.No.24767 of 2017 15.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pushpaveni vs The District Collector Coimbatore District

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
15 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Duraiswamy