Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Pushpanjali vs Miss Chitralekha Thumboochetty D/O Late And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|30 October, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY REVIEW PETITION NO.289 OF 2017 In R.F.A. NO.1104/2016 BETWEEN:
M/S PUSHPANJALI REP. BY ITS PROPRIETRIX SMT.JYOTHINANDALAL KAPAI AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, SHOP NO. 47, GROUND FLOOR, SHRUNGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX, NO. 80/1, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI.R B SADASIVAPPA, ADV.) AND:
1. MISS.CHITRALEKHA THUMBOOCHETTY D/O LATE SRI F THUMBOOCHETTY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, NO.17, PROMENADE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.
2. SRI.JOHN RAVIKANTH THUMBOOCHETTY S/O LATE SRI F THUMBOOCHETTY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, NO.17, PROMENADE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.
3. MRS. MARY GEETHANJALI THUMBOOCHETTY D/O LATE SRI F THUMBOOCHETTY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NO. 13/4, BELALE STREET LIVEPOOL NEW SOUTH EALES AUSTALIA.
4. SRI BERNARD VIKRAM THUMBOOCHETTY S/O LATE SRI F THUMBOOCHETTY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, NO.16, PROMENADE ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 005.
5. M/S DNL ENTERPRISES NO.79/80, M.G. ROAD, SHRUNGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY ITS PARTNER SRI SHANKAR THAMBRE.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ASHOK B PATIL AND SRI.VIGNESH V. ADVS. FOR R1 TO R3) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED:27/04/2017 PASSED IN RFA NO.1104/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
THIS RP IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This Review petition is filed seeking to review the order passed in Regular First Appeal No.1104 of 2016 disposed of on 27th April 2017.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner.
After considering the matter in detail and depth, the matter is fully discussed at the time of disposing of the regular first appeals and when it is done by this Court while disposing of the appeals, now it may not be proper to re-consider the same. I do not find any scope for interference.
Accordingly, review petition stands dismissed.
lnn Sd/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Pushpanjali vs Miss Chitralekha Thumboochetty D/O Late And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
30 October, 2017
Judges
  • L Narayana Swamy