Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Pushpalingam vs The District Collector

Madras High Court|09 January, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The case of the petitioners is that since there is an admission on part of the respondents that the land is Grama Natham, the provisions of the Land Encroachment Act, 2005, would not be applicable in view of various judicial pronouncements commencing from S.Rangaraja Iyengar vs. Achi Kannu Ammal, 1959 (2) MLJ 513. It is contended that the land being Grama Natham never vested with the Government or the Town Panchayat. However, the judicial pronouncement produced before us referred to the fact that patta has been issued in respect of private party.
2.On our query raised, it is conceded that no documents have been placed before us in respect of issuance of pattas and even otherwise, the entitlement of the petitioners to the land would be in question. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, however, submits that as the petitioners are in long occupation of the Grama Natham, the only remedy with the respondents is to acquire the land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. It is an accepted position that against the impugned order passed under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act, an appeal would be maintainable. The appellate authority would, then, look into the aforesaid issues to determine as to whether the provisions of the said Act would apply in the facts of the case or not.
3.We, thus, relegate the petitioners to the remedy of appeal, with the appeal being required to be filed within fifteen (15) days from today and an endeavour would be made to conclude the proceedings in appeal within a maximum period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of the order.
4.In view of the fact that interim protection has been available to the petitioners during the pendency of the petitions, the same would enure for the benefit of the petitioners till the disposal of the appeal.
Writ petitions, accordingly, stand disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
(S.K.K., CJ.) (M.S., J.) 09.01.2017 Index : Yes/No Website : Yes/No sra To
1.The District Collector, Chennai District, Singaravelar Maaligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.
2.The Tahsildar, Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Chennai 600 078.
The Hon'ble Chief Justice and M.Sundar, J.
(sra) W.P.Nos.6255 to 6259 of 2012 09.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pushpalingam vs The District Collector

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
09 January, 2017