Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Pushpak Granites And Others vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Telangana|02 July, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE :PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI MADAN B.LOKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON`BLE SRI JUSTICE: SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 8221 of 2010 Between:
1. M/s. Pushpak Granites, rep. by its Partner, G.Satish, S/o. G.Sankar Rao
2. M/s. Abhishek Granites, rep. by its Managing Partner G.Suresh Kumar, S/o. G.Yelloji Rao.
Petitioners AND
1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Department of Industries and Commerce, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Director of Mines & Geology, BRKR Building, 8th Floor, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.
3. The Deputy Director of Mines & Geology, Warangal, Warangal District.
4. The Assistant Director of Mines & Geology, Khammam, Khammam District.
5. The Assistant Director of Mines & Geology, Warangal, Warangal District.
Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or writ one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring Rule 10(5)(i), 10(5)(ii), S.I.No. 17 of Schedule II of Rule 10 and Schedule III of Rule 10 of A.P. Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 framed by G.O.Ms.No. 104, Industries and Commerce Department, dt. 15-05-2009 as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rules.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated. 13-04-2010 made in WPMP.No. 10559/2010 and upon hearing the arguments of Smt. Shoba N, Advocate for the Petitioner, the Court made the following ORDER:
“ Not only have the respondents filed any counter affidavit there is also no appearance on behalf of the respondents.
The writ petition is already admitted. List on 12-09-2012.
Interim orders to continue until then.”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // To for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1. Two CCs to G.P. for Mines & Geology, High Court of A.P.Hyd(OUT)
2. One CC to Smt. Shoba N, Advocate(OPUC)
3. Two spare copies.
SAH HIGH COURT HCJ & SKJ DATED: 07-03-2012 NOTE: LIST ON 12-09-2012 ORDER WP.NO. 8221 OF 2010 INTERIM ORDER TO CONTINUE DRAFTED BY: SAH APPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 09-03-2012 HIGH COURT HCJ & SKJ DATED: 07-03-2012 NOTE: LIST ON 12-09-2012 ORDER WP.NO. 8221 OF 2010 INTERIM ORDER TO CONTINUE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Pushpak Granites And Others vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
02 July, 2014
Judges
  • Sri Madan B Lokur