Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Pushpa vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42723 of 2019 Petitioner :- Smt. Pushpa Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Basant Kumar Chauhan,Ram Janam Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Ram Janam, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and perused the record.
By means of this writ petition under article 226 of the constitution, the petitioner has come up to challenge the demand notice dated 11.10.2019 and 1.11.2019 issued by the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Kachhla, District Budaun.
In our considered opinion, a mere demand notice does not raise any cause of action to maintain the writ petition at this stage. It is always open for the petitioner to move before the competent authority by filing objection against the demand notice.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed and consigned to record.
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 20.12.2019 Shiraz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Pushpa vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2019
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Basant Kumar Chauhan Ram Janam Singh