Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18767 of 2021 Petitioner :- Pushpa Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Singh Yadav,Sajjan Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Syed Nadeem Ahmad
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2 whereas Sri Syed Nadeem Ahmad, learned counsel appears for the respondents no.3, 4 and 5.
The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter- alia with the following prayer:-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Mau to grant arrears of salary to the petitioner since 1.7.2015 to 25.10.2015 along with interest at a rate to be specified by this Hon'ble Court."
It is admitted between the parties that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgement dated 19.08.2017 passed in Writ A No.33360 of 2017 (Angad Yadav and 7 others Vs. State of U.P. and 4 others).
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself.
In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to make a fresh representation ventilating all his grievances before the respondent no.4 along-with certified copy of this order within a period of three weeks from today. If such a representation is made, the respondent no.4 is directed to pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a further period of two months in the light of law laid down by this Court in the case of Angad (supra).
With the aforesaid observations, present writ petition is disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 23.12.2021 Pramod Tripathi