Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Pushpa Rai vs Bangalore Development Authority And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|10 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT W.P.NOS.42021-42022 OF 2018 (BDA) BETWEEN PUSHPA RAI, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O LATE RAMESH RAI, SHOP PREMISES NOS. 37 AND 22, BDA INDIRANAGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX, BANGALORE – 560038. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPAT ANAND SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 001.
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE.
3. M/S M.K. EMBASSY LAND DEVELOPERS PVT. LIMITED, REPRESETNED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, EMBASSY POINT 150, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
4. M/S MAVERICK HOLDINGS & INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, EMBASSY POINT 150, INFATRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. ... RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO THE EFFECT THAT THE RESOLUTION OF R-1 DATED 27.3.2018 BEARING NO. 92/2018 VIDE ANNEX-A ON THE SUBJECT OF RELOCATION AND REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING TENANTS IN THE INDIRANAGAR COMMERCIAL COMPLEX BELONGING TO THE R-1 AUTHORITY IS TOALLY ILLEGAL, UNJUST, ARBITRARY, ILLUSORY AND HAS ADMITTEDLY BEEN PASSED BEHIND THE BACK OF THE PETITIONER AND OTHER TENANTS OF THE SAID COMPLEX I.E., IN UTTER VIOLATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE, NOTWITHSTANDING THE COMMITMENT MADE BY THE R-1 AUTHORITY BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT IN THE PREVIOUS APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS AS WELL AS IN THE REVIEW PROCEEDIGNS NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN RESPECT OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE SAID COMPLEX VIS-A-VIS THE RIGHT OF THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS TO OCCUPY THE RESPECTIVE PREMISES IN QUESTION AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the Petitioner has filed a Memo dated 27.09.2018 seeking withdrawal of Writ Petition.
The Memo is taken on record. Leave is accorded.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim Orders, is any, stand dissolved.
Costs made easy.
Sd/- JUDGE cbc
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pushpa Rai vs Bangalore Development Authority And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
10 January, 2019
Judges
  • Krishna S Dixit