Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Purshottam Lal vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|11 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16233 of 2019 Petitioner :- Purshottam Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J. Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Satya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. dated 04.12.2017 registered as case crime no. 0601 of 2017 under sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC, P.S. Link Road, District Ghaziabad.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR; the main allegation was levelled against his father in respect of having got the sale deed executed through an imposter; the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated only because he is the son of the main accused and the main accused has already been granted bail.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for quashing.
Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and nature of the allegations, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in above mentioned case till the submission of the police report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. but they shall co- operate with the investigation of the case.
With the above direction this petition is finally disposed of.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.) Order Date :- 11.6.2019 Meenu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Purshottam Lal vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
11 June, 2019
Judges
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh I
Advocates
  • Satya Prakash Singh