Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Purnima Singh vs Anil Kumar Pathak

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2589 of 2019 Applicant :- Smt. Purnima Singh Opposite Party :- Anil Kumar Pathak, Tahisldar(Judicial) Counsel for Applicant :- Deo Prakash Singh Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to initiate contempt proceeding against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order dated 27.04.2018 passed in Writ Petition No.15296 of 2018 (Purnima Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors.). For ready reference the order dated 27.04.2018 is quoted as under:-
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shushil Kumar Shukla, learned State Law Officer for the State respondents and Shri Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay, Advocate appearing for the fourth respondent.
The petitioner is before this Court with the request to command the Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Lalganj, District Azamgarh to finalize and conclude the proceedings of Mutation Case no.20/4/5060488 of 2014 (Purnima vs. Ashok Kumar) under Section 34 L.R. Act 1901, expeditiously.
Learned Standing Counsel and Shri Shri Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay, Advocate very fairly state that in case the aforesaid case is still pending, the same shall be considered and decided by the Authority concerned expeditiously.
In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on consent, the writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Lalganj, District Azamgarh to expedite the hearing of the aforesaid case and conclude the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, except upon payment of cost but certainly after according opportunity of hearing to all the stake holders in the matter."
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that a certified copy of the aforesaid order was submitted for compliance before the opposite parties but the opposite parties have wilfully not complied with the order and, thus, have committed civil contempt liable for punishment under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Prima facie a case of contempt has been made out. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, one more opportunity is afforded to the opposite parties to comply with the aforesaid order of the Court within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
The applicant shall supply a duly stamped registered envelope addressed to the opposite parties and another self-addressed stamped envelope to the office within one week from today. The office shall send a copy of this order along with the self- addressed stamped envelope of the applicant with a copy of contempt application to the opposite parties within one week, thereafter and keep a record thereof. The opposite party shall comply with the directions of the writ Court and intimate the applicant of the order through the self-addressed envelop within a week, thereafter.
With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of at this stage with liberty to the applicant to move a fresh application, if the order is not complied with by the opposite parties within the stipulated time as aforementioned.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 SP/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Purnima Singh vs Anil Kumar Pathak

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2019
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Deo Prakash Singh