ANTONY DOMINIC, J. This appeal is filed against the judgment in W.P.(C).No. 21499/2013, which was filed challenging the revenue recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner, at the instance of the 2nd respondent, for recovery of the balance amount due from him towards electricity charges. Initially Rs. 10,952/- was due from the appellant. On an application made by him, by Ext.P2, he was allowed to pay the amount in five instalments. The initial instalment of one-third and second and third instalments were paid. Thereafter, the appellant committed default, which led to disconnection of power supply and dismantling the installation itself. It is thereafter that, by Ext.P4, revenue recovery proceedings were initiated for recovery of Rs. 8,011/- and other charges.
2. The statement filed by the respondents shows that this amount consists of the minimum guarantee amount due, monthly charges for the period from June 2009 to August, 2010 and surcharge. Credit has also been given to the three instalments remitted by the appellant, and the cash deposit of Rs. 5,200/-. Such recovery proceedings, as held by the learned Single Judge, do not suffer from any of the vitiating circumstances justifying interference. Therefore, the learned Single Judge was right in dismissing the Writ Petition.
The appeal fails and accordingly, the same is dismissed.
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Sd/-
sdk+ ALEXANDER THOMAS , JUDGE ///True copy/// P.S. to Judge