Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Priyanka Singh And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9858 of 2021 Petitioner :- Smt. Priyanka Singh And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Fakhruzzaman Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Rama Pati Tripathi
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Rama Pati Tripathi, learned counsel for the complainant and the learned A.G.A.
This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 30.09.2021 registered as Case Crime No. 855 of 2021, under Section 366 IPC, Police Station- Naubasta, District- Kanpur Nagar (Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition).
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest or harass the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report."
Learned AGA opposed the prayer for quashing of the FIR, which discloses cognizable offence.
Perusal of the impugned first information report prima facie reveals commission of cognizable offence. Therefore, in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 and M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2021 SC 1918 and Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati & Anr. Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh, in Special Leave To Appeal (Crl.) No. 3262 of 2021 decided on 7.10.2021, no case has been made out for interference with the impugned first information report.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed leaving it open for the petitioners to apply before the competent court for bail/anticipatory bail as permissible in law and in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by the petitioners alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number to which the said Aadhar Card is linked.
The concerned Court shall verify the authenticity of such computerised copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 26.10.2021 Digitally signed byASU.KBH.ASSHrivastaDvigaitally signed by JUSTICE VIDYARTHI Date: 2021.10.26 17:27:12 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI Date: 2021.10.26 17:28:42 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Priyanka Singh And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 October, 2021
Judges
  • Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Fakhruzzaman