Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18289 of 2021 Petitioner :- Priti Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Sharma,Ram Mani Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.S.Parihar Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3.
The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayers:-
"(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to check the copy of the petitioner and declare the result of the petitioner and award the marks to the petitioner of his answer sheet."
It is argued by Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3 that for the relief as sought in the present petition, the petitioner has already submitted a representation on 29.10.2021 before the respondent No.2/Secretary, U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board, Prayagraj, copy of which is appended as Annexure No.7 to the writ petition. It is further argued that the respondent no.2 will decide the aforesaid representation expeditiously.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection if the aforesaid representation has been decided within a time bound period.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In view of the undertaking given by Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3, this petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from today.
Sri A.K.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondents is directed to communicate regarding this order to respondent No.2/Secretary, U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board, Prayagraj. The information given by him to respondent no.2 shall also deem to be sufficient in the matter.
Order Date :- 17.12.2021/saqlain