Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Premalatha vs Mery Rezina

Madras High Court|19 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Petitioner seeks quash of proceedings in S.T.C.No.468 of 2012 on the file of Fast Track Court II, Erode.
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent.
The case in S.T.C.No.468 of 2012 is one which informs commission of offence u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The grounds canvassed on behalf of petitioner are that even before the issue of cheque, stop payment instruction had been issued to the bank and that the Court below has no territorial jurisdiction to deal with the case on the strength of issue of statutory notice. Both contentions are devoid of merits and accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition shall stand dismissed. It is open to the petitioner to raise all contentions before the trial Court. All such contentions should necessarily be dealt with solely on merits. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
19.06.2017 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No bri/gm To The Fast Track Court II, Erode.
C.T.SELVAM, J bri/gm Crl.O.P.No.2129 of 2013 19.06.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Premalatha vs Mery Rezina

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
19 June, 2017