The petitioner had submitted Ext.P5 application before the second respondent under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967. According to the petitioner, the property in question is neither paddy land nor wet land as per the data bank particulars available with the Local Level Monitoring Committee. Ext.P2 is the said document which evidences that the property is not included as a paddy land or wet land. Under these circumstances, it is for the second respondent to consider Ext.P5 in accordance with the procedure prescribed. 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader and having perused the averments in the writ petition, I am of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of as under:
The second respondent is directed to consider Ext.P5 after hearing the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
sd // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE