Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Pravin Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17079 of 2019 Petitioner :- Pravin Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhay Raj Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Vindeshwari Prasad
Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Vindeshwari Prasad, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer to quash the first information report dated 3.6.2019 registered in Case Crime No. 0247 of 2019, under Sections 354-A, 323, 504, 506 and 394 I.P.C. and Section 3 (2) (Va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, P.S. Kyedganj, district Prayagraj.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the impugned first information report has been lodged by the respondent no. 4 containing absolutely false and concocted allegations against the petitioners with the ulterior intention of harassing them. He further submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the impugned first information report no evidence is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the complicity of the petitioners in the commission of the alleged crime and hence the impugned first information report is liable to be quashed.
Per contra the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant contended that the allegation contained in the first information report cannot be aborted at this stage. The petitioners will have ample opportunity to rebut the allegations made against them.
From the perusal of the first information report, it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein, prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interference with the first information report. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned first information report is refused. The writ petition sans any merit and is accordingly dismissed.
However, considering the nature of the allegations made in the first information report and submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, it is directed that in case the petitioners appear before the court concerned within thirty days from today and apply for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 24.6.2019 Shahnawaz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Pravin Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 June, 2019
Judges
  • Naheed Ara Moonis
Advocates
  • Abhay Raj Yadav