Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Praveen Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|18 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19842 of 2018 Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anadi Krishna Narayana
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Heard Shri Anil Kumar Pandey for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 and Shri Anadi Krishna Narayana for the respondent nos.3 and 4.
The petitioner in the writ petition is seeking the following main relief:-
"(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner in view of the office memorandum dated 15.06.2018 within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show that the representation which the petitioner wants to be decided is a statutory representation. In the absence of any rule providing for filing of representation and the same to be decided by the respondents, no such direction can be issued to the respondents to decide his representation unless there is a corresponding statutory obligation on the State to decide the representation.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.9.2018 SK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Praveen Kumar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
18 September, 2018
Judges
  • B Amit Sthalekar
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar Pandey